From the monthly archives:

October 2007

Giving the Store Away

by Mike Schultz on October 19, 2007

I received the following question from a listener of our recent teleseminar Selling To Big Companies: How To Secure Your First Meeting (download available).

I have a question on free services as a hook. We have started an offering of free assessments and 40 free hours to work with any client’s particular needs. We advertise this in our marketing e-mails and direct mail. In your experience, does this really sway a decision maker into thinking, “Well I can try this company and if does not work out, then we can both walk away, and it does not cost me anything.”

Offering a service sample or an “entry service” can be a powerful marketing tool. After all, most firms would agree, “Once a company experiences our services and our people, they have a high degree of likelihood of continuing to work with us for the long-term.”

One Wellesley Hills Group client, when they have an initial business development call with a new prospect, sets a team of people on a two week research engagement to deliver primary data and analysis during the initial call. Prospects are impressed as a matter of course. Our client’s average sales are in the six and seven figures, so as a business strategy, the serious staff time investment is well worth the return.

That being said, here are a few thoughts for you:

* Offering hours isn’t particularly appealing. Indeed, folks like Ron Baker at Verasage would argue you’re making a pretty big mistake even using “hours” as something you sell.

* Consider offering a particular service – regardless of the time commitment – as your initial strategy. Then you can build marketing and business development campaigns around that service. “We’ll study your ABC strategy/situation/problem and give you our complimentary 123 Strategy Assessment.”

* Make sure you deliver strong value in the service. It can’t be pitchy or a thinly veiled sales tactic. It has to be good. Many folks, when they read this, might say, “Duh! Of course we’ll deliver high quality.” Still, I’ve often observed providers falling into the trap of making their front-end services (free or paid) too salesy or not meaty enough.

* Target carefully. Some prospects might be worth the effort, and some not. Plus, make it exclusive and it becomes more desirable.

* Don’t be surprised when fewer people than you think take you up on the service. You might think, “This is great. It’s worth tens of thousands of dollars. We may get flooded with people taking us up on it!” Yet, it doesn’t often happen. Many buyers are leery of free service tests and/or don’t want to feel obligated to buy something even if the service test is appealing.

* Don’t let your prospect think that your services have little value. Make sure they understand that a five figure service offered for free is still worth five figures.

It’s tough enough transitioning from free work to paid work. You don’t want free offers that portray your expertise as any less than it’s actually worth.

* Consider packaging a strong initial service and charging for it versus delivering it for free.

A few weeks ago I was playing golf with some old friends. Now that my old friends are, well, old, conversations tend to include family, kids, hobbies (what little time we have for them), and work. One of my old buddies is a litigation partner at a suburban law firm outside of Boston. He was talking to a friend who runs a hedge fund. Here’s how the conversation went:

Blah blah blah kids blah blah blah hobbies blah blah blah family vacation blah blah…

…by the way, does your company’s law firm have a litigation department? Even if they do, if you ever run into a problem you should give me a call. Our rates are really reasonable. Less than $300 an hour.

My first thought for my old buddy was…mistake. When it comes to litigation attorneys, hedge fund managers don’t buy hourly rates. They buy winners.

Because of the nature of my work, I happen to know the details of the rates that many consulting, accounting, technology services, law, and other professional services firms charge. I know who charges fixed fees, who charges time and materials, and who uses contingency fees. I know how my clients scope projects, and I know (sometimes more than they do) what their project profitability is.

While I’ve read research on the subject (nothing much I liked), more questions came to mind. On a large scale, I’d like to know:

  • What are the regional differences in pricing and fees?
  • Do large firms charge more than small firms? The other way around?
  • What are the differences across service specialties?
  • How much does brand recognition affect the ability of firms to charge premium fees?
  • Do service firms discount? If so, when?
  • Are “compliance” services really commodities, generating lower fees than other value-added services?
  • Are the higher fee firms more profitable? If so, how much?
  • Are firms with higher fees growing faster than firms with lower fees?
  • What do firms with the highest fees do differently than those with average and lower fees?
  • Do national firms with national clients generate higher fees than regional or local players?
  • Do firms with set service packages and specialties generate higher fees than generalists?
  • How do firms go about raising fees?
  • What have firms learned about fees?
  • Are fees going up? If so, how fast?
  • As a percent, how many firms offer fixed fee, time and materials, and contingency fees? Of these firms, are any of them faster growing or more profitable than the others?

Thus was born our newest major research report on pricing and fees in professional services. We’re just getting the survey writing and response generation process underway now, and expect to launch the report in early 2008 through RainToday.com.

What data have you seen about service firm fees and pricing? When it comes to fees and pricing, what do you want to know? Feel free to email me or comment below.