Inbound Marketing Works, But Don’t Abandon Your Outbound Tactics Just Yet

by Mike Schultz and Michelle Davidson on June 2, 2010

When it comes to cost per sales lead, inbound marketing channels continue to deliver dramatically lower costs over outbound channels. In fact, organizations that primarily use inbound channels experience a 60% lower cost per lead than those that mainly use outbound channels, according to HubSpot’s The State of Inbound Marketing 2010.

Indeed, three out of the four inbound channels analyzed have lower costs than any outbound channel, the report finds. Topping the list is social media and blogs, with 63% of the 231 marketing professionals surveyed saying those channels had below-average costs. Twenty-seven percent said they had near-average costs. That’s followed by organic search engine optimization (SEO) with 43% saying it had below-average costs.

Firms save money using inbound marketing channels to acquire leads by:

  • Spending less to produce such content;
  • Generating leads long after the content is published;
  • Improving their online visibility as they build a reputation within social media networks and in the eyes of search engines.

That doesn’t mean, however, that firms should abandon all outbound marketing tactics (direct mail, email, cold calling, etc.). They might cost more, but they can be incredibly effective. Some prospects and clients respond better to those and don’t even have social media networks such as Twitter and Facebook on their radar.

The best approach is to apply a mix of both. Continue to use your preferred outbound, or push, tactics—tactics that have traditionally performed well for you—but also make sure you have a strong website with quality content that is optimized for search engines. Then begin to test the social media waters with perhaps a blog or activity on LinkedIn.

Each marketing tactic has its success stories:

The key is to measurably test different tactics, analyze the results, and determine which work best for you.

While it may take longer to figure out if an inbound approach works for your firm, there are certainly results to prove that it’s worth the investment.

You may find that your prospects are looking for your services in places you hadn’t thought about, and that you can generate leads at a lower cost.

LinkedIn      Facebook      StumpleUpon
Buzz     Digg    De.licio.us

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Ryan Beale June 2, 2010 at 8:58 am

Great Post, Mike!

(full disclosure – i work at HubSpot) It is often overlooked that companies need to first understand which oubtound marketing tactics are producing ROI and continue to leverage those marketing tactics as they implement an inbound strategy. As you know, Inbound Marketing takes time, so maintaining a consistent lead flow from outbound marketing is important while getting started with inbound. If you can test and realize that certain outbound tactics are generating great ROI, then there is no point in stopping! ABT – Always Be Testing :)

@RBeale

Ed Dearborn June 10, 2010 at 7:04 pm

I have been marketing for Dr.’s for years and what you touch upon is on target with their weaknesses. The same with the Accounting industry. Each of these professions have much to offer, but have not learned blog 101 to even get off the ground. I just completed “Inbound Marketing”, which was written by the CEO and CTO of Hubspot, and I cannot recommend it enough.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: