Is Thought Leadership Necessary?

by Mike Schultz on December 10, 2009

I'm a thought leader!

“They told me I had to become a thought leader or I’d never achieve great success as a professional.” This is what a leader at a professional services firm told me recently that a marketing consultant told him.

He didn’t say this to me matter-of-factly either. He said it with a mix of fear, skepticism, sadness, and hope.

  • Fear. Because he can’t write and doesn’t have much “new” to say, and neither do the rest of the folks on his leadership team.
  • Skepticism. Because he didn’t think it was true that thought leadership was now a requirement, but he was starting to hear it so much he thought maybe the tide had turned and it now was.
  • Sadness. Because he liked his job selling, delivering, and managing and didn’t want to become, as he put it, a “professor type”.
  • Hope. Because he was hoping I’d say what he wanted me to say: that it was not true.

He was…

…right! It’s not true. Ludwig Feuerbach* noted, “A being without suffering is a being without being.” Given the drumbeat of advice to professionals to become thought leaders, you might be convinced that a firm without thought leadership is a firm not worth a damn.

Some industry watchers and consultants these days are downright dogmatic in their belief that, to achieve all you can achieve as a professional, you have to become a thought leader. And to differentiate your firm, you have to become a thought leader. Same for generating leads, raising prices, and competing for the best clients.

False. Not true. El wrongo.

Now don’t get me wrong. I’m a huge fan of thought leadership, partly because as a member of the faculty at Babson College I am a “professor type”, but mostly because of what good thought leadership can do for a firm.

Thought leadership helps with:

  • Lead generation
  • Fee maximization
  • Branding
  • Winning deals
  • Drawing the best candidates to work at your firm
  • Repeat business
  • Confidence of the thought leader

And the list doesn’t stop there. No question, thought leadership is helpful, but is it necessary?

Let’s say you need heart surgery. All you know about your two potential surgeons is that one pioneered and is most widely published regarding the surgery you need, and the other is in the prime of his career and has performed the surgery 1,500 times but has never published.

Let’s say you need much greater efficiency in your supply chain. One consultant wrote the book on it, and while the other hasn’t written a lick about it, she and her firm have a long track record of success getting done what you need to get done.

Let’s say you just got word that another company stole your patent. Which lawyer do you hire, the one that writes most often about winning the type of case you want to win, or the one that has won the most?

It’s likely most buyers would prefer the latter in each. Perhaps you might have said to at least one of them, “Well, I don’t know!” In either scenario, you prove the point: thought leadership isn’t necessary. As some of you might have hoped, you may not have to devote time, energy, and money into becoming the leading thinker in your space!

But you probably do have to spend time, energy, and money on something else if you want to outfox the thought leaders and benefits that thought leadership bring to them. Here are a few thoughts that can get you started on how you might do it for your firm.

1. Most buyers aren’t persuaded by thought leadership per se, they’re persuaded by authority. The concept of thought leadership implies originality in thinking. Not only does good thought leadership not have to be original, you really don’t have to add anything at all to your field to establish yourself as an authority. What you have to establish is expertise in the subject, and proof of your ability to perform successfully in the subject area. You can do this through publishing case studies. You can speak at conferences and events with your clients at your side about the work you’ve done and the value it delivered. You can become a leader in a professional association and be seen as a fixture in the industry. All these things create authority, and you don’t necessarily have to have one original thought in your head to do them!

2. Buyers buy helpfulness. Perhaps you’re an innovation consultant, or compensation consultant, or a lawyer. In your marketing process you can demonstrate your helpfulness through a host of methods such as case studies, client testimonial videos, clear and logical service descriptions and packages, email newsletters that highlight (but don’t introduce) new thinking in the industry, professional development seminars, and so on. In your selling process you can demonstrate your helpfulness by listening, uncovering needs, crafting a strong solution, and delivering value even before they start working with you. You can do all of this without a book, white paper, or article to your credit.

3. People buy consistency and quality. I don’t know about you, but many times I’ve simply wished a service provider did what they said they were going to do, and did it to a high standard. We don’t always need new thinking, but we need to trust that people can deliver when they say they can so we don’t have to worry about it or do it all over when it comes out poorly.

4. People buy who they like best. In Mastering Rainmaking Conversations, we tell a story about how a CFO friend of ours chose one of the Big 5 (at the time) accounting firms to take a company public. The long and short of it is that, while he publicly justified it with an analytical argument, he told me privately that he hired the firm whose staff he liked best.

Another key argument in the you-must-be-thought-leadery-or-else camp is that you can’t differentiate without thought leadership. I agree that thought leadership is a good means to differentiation, but it’s not the only means.

For example, imagine you’re all of the good things (consistent, likeable, helpful, etc.) noted above. Develop a reputation for these and you’re setting yourself apart right there. You can also develop a compelling service package that will seduce people with your value and stand out from the crowd. As we wrote in Professional Services Marketing, Bain uses the Profit Hunt service well in this regard. We use the Revenue Growth Benchmark Assessment. There’s no reason you can’t offer your own.

Yes, thought leadership can help you stand out, but you don’t need thought leadership to stand out. You can convey, without being a thought leader, what sets you apart from others as well as how hard it would be to substitute your firm with another provider. I’m not saying it’s easy to convey these things, but then again, anything that’s worthwhile to pursue is likely not to be easy.

The truth of the matter is that not everyone can or should be a thought leader, and that does not make them second-class professionals. As helpful as thought leadership might be in the right situations, you can achieve fabulous success without it.

* Everyone’s favorite Marxist philosopher, of course.

LinkedIn      Facebook      StumpleUpon
Buzz     Digg    De.licio.us

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

Charlene December 10, 2009 at 6:34 pm

Mike,
Agree. I recently wrote a post on my blog titled “Your Business Perspective Matters” after reading an article stating business people should all follow 19 these thought leaders.

We all need to embrace our own perspectives and be creative, but we don’t have to all follow or be “thought leaders.” You can read my blog post here:
http://blog.kamigomarketing.com/index.cfm/2009/11/4/Your-Business-Perspective-Matters

Mike December 11, 2009 at 10:16 am

Charlene,

Yes, indeed, we need to embrace our own perspectives and be creative, but that doesn’t mean every person in the world needs to put themselves forth as a leading thinker.

If everyone was a leading thinker, then there’d be no one following!

Mike

Tim Prizeman December 14, 2009 at 5:56 pm

Mike

Definitely one of the best articles I have read on thought leadership.

Clearly not everyone can be a “thought leader” – whatever that is, but certainly it must involve having ground-breaking ideas in some form. Quite frankly many people aren’t up to it (even/especially in top firms), and would rather spend the time doing another aspect of their job.

Also, the term has become completely debased – with everyday activity now described as “thought leadership” because it sounds more impressive. For instance the application of the term to Opinion Polls is a great example – they are a really useful tool for getting coverage or showing interest in an area, for instance.

Asking questions per se is not “thought leadership” – having a damn good explanation for the results and why they are important is more like it… yet this is often the bit lacking.

Tim

Mike Schultz December 14, 2009 at 6:01 pm

Thanks, Tim. I apprecate your comment.

I agree that the term has become debased. Reminds me of the ’80s when everyone started to sell “solutions”. I remember a time that only chemists sold solutions, now everyone says they do. But just because they say they “solve problems” doesn’t mean they actually do.

These days everyone who writes a blog post or gives a speech calls themselves a thought leader. Just because you say it doesn’t mean it’s true.

Mike

P.S. And everyone who is out of work these days is a “consultant”.

Vickie Sullivan December 22, 2009 at 11:57 am

Mike, you make a great distinction. Too many people mistake thought leadership with authority.

Unless you’re new in town, any one with more than a few years of experience has clients who like them and are willing to give a testimonial. In a market filled with the same claims backed by great track records, how do buyers make a choice?

It’s the conversations we have. In those conversations, when we actually help the client, the buyer experiences what they will get — and that can tip the scale.

Keep up the good thinking and have a great holiday!

Vickie

Mike Schultz December 22, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Thanks for the thoughts, Vickie. Thought leadership is a great way to strengthen your services by staying on the cutting edge and providing you with differentiation. Meanwhile, as you point out, thought leadership is just one way to do these things.

Providing value in conversations differentiates. Getting testimonials provides substantiation for your claims of how you help. And you can do it all without writing a white paper.

Mike

Rodger Deans December 22, 2009 at 6:51 pm

Mike,
I am a business consultant and have a client who specialises in a very specific market of GxP services (consulting and audit) to bio-medical manufacturers. I have just recommended a strategic “Thought Leadership” marketing approach to help with international expansion, brand positioning, lead generation, customer retention, stopping the fee squeeze, differentiating from competition…all aspects of delivering a good marketing plan.
Their board is split on implementing this approach as it requires change.
Your article would support the status quo. My point is that the current processes are not producing the goods. The bar is getting higher all the time. New managers buying their services are younger and gather information differently. They need to continue to do the hand shaking and delivering on promises all the time but they also need to transition into the digital information age. More over they have so much experience, case studies, learning modules and material that can be re-purposed for content, its actually an underutilized asset.
How can I get momentum going for this approach?

Rodger

Mike Schultz December 26, 2009 at 10:19 am

Rodger,

You have a pretty tough road ahead of you. It’s a common one as many in the professions don’t want to work as hard as the need to in order to compete as strongly as they can in the market, but it’s still tough.

Here are a few thoughts and comments:

1. I wouldn’t equate my argument necessarily to supporting the status quo as I don’t know what the status quo is. I am arguing that firms need to commucate their value in the market, but that thought leadership isn’t the only path. If they’re communicating their value and getting it across broadly to the buyers in the market they should be in good shape already.

If their not and they don’t want to pursue thought leadership (which, as I state above is a perfectly reasonable strategy to pursue) what are they going to do instead, and why do they think it will work? Their answer should be pretty telling.

2. Is it lack of communication of thought leadership that’s the problem, or is it something else? Let me give you a few observations about professional services firm leaders. Many are great, hard working, sharp, and focused on doing their best to succeed. There are quite a number however that:
- Don’t want to do the work they need to do to succeed.
- Aren’t serious about being a leader in their market.
- Aren’t passionate, energetic, and enthusiastic to come to work and be better today than they were yesterday.
- Talk a good game about “providing value over and above the norm” and “being a committed partner in their clients’ success” but don’t really deliver on it.
- Are too dysfunctional an organization to get past a vocal group of naysayers to do anything interesting, bold, or productive.
- Are happy with the status quo, and don’t see negative consequences of just doing more of the same.

Perhaps none of these are true at your firm, but they are true of some firms. If any of the above are the case, you should tackle these problems firms. Or go someplace else.

3. While they might have case studies, learning modules, and experience, that does not mean they have anything that qualifies as thought leadership. Sure, all that content might provide a path to help establish them as an authority in the industry, but do they really have what it takes to be a thought leader? Being a thought leader takes personal commitment; people are thought leaders, not companies.

Even at places like McKinsey – widely recognized as being a firm filled with thought leaders – is still just that: a firm filled with people that are thought leaders. So if you don’t have the people that want to stake their name to some thinking, thought leadership is as likely to succeed as the Swedish Chef would in Hell’s Kitchen.

Mike

Clare McDermott December 30, 2009 at 10:49 am

Hi Mike: Very interesting article. Too often I see folks consider thought leadership marketing as de rigueur, even while the firm may not truly have the resources nor inclination to do the job well. I wrote on the subject this month here: http://soloportfolio.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/everyones-a-thought-leader/
I am particularly interested in seeing how thought leaders marry expertise with information design to keep their followers engaged and thinking in new ways about old information.

Content marketing needs to be a well-thought out strategy. I’m afraid the democratization of e-publishing tools has spawned a massive wave of mediocre thought leadership marketing in professional services. I think you hit on something important when you talked about passion. Thought leadership in a particular area of expertise requires deep knowledge + passion. Yes!

Btw, you and I were in business school together at Babson. I remember you in particular because you were an uber-networker! Great to see your success!

Randy Shattuck January 22, 2010 at 1:31 pm

Mike,

Your most recent article is spot-on. So much of what passes for TL today is poorly articulated ideas that only arise from the limited experience of the “author,” who more often than not didn’t write the article in the first place. The true beneficiaries of the push toward TL is writers. Most of the good free-lance writers I know are in feast mode right now.

I often relate the experience of one my fellow graduate students who attempted to build his entire master’s thesis around his personal experience of developing a new, innovative, and complex booking system for a major airline. While his experiences, and the value he delivered to his organization, were indeed rich, they were, after all, only his. He was forced to overhaul his entire approach by one of our professors because he didn’t include any research, any ideas outside of his own and the limited team he worked with.

The point is this. No matter how brilliant you may be as a practitioner, to be a thought leader, you must have ideas beyond yourself. More often than not, “research” (which can take many forms) becomes a key driver in shaping those outside ideas. In my experience, very few organizations are actually willing to put the time and effort into developing good quality research that can fuel good quality TL. And to your point, they don’t have to. TL is not for everyone.

The bad news for those who truly work hard to be thought leaders is that the market is becoming very cloudy. There are more “articles” today than ever before, and most of them are limited in the value and insights they offer. TL has become a primary SEO strategy where certain practitioners are seeking to have more web links than quality ideas, hoping this will drive traffic to their sites.

TL isn’t just about opinions. Everyone has those. Good quality TL is about ideas, strategies, and to a limited degree tactics, that consistently and repeatedly produce outstanding business results.

Thanks for taking the lead on this point Mike. Well stated.

Mike Schultz January 22, 2010 at 2:04 pm

Thanks, Randy, for the kind words and the comment. There is a lot of noise out there, for sure, masquerading as thought leadership. While it might be more difficult to find it, the people putting fort truly worthwhile ideas will still rise to the top.

Derrick March 30, 2010 at 4:56 pm

Hi Mike,

What is ‘Thought Leadership’.

I’ve looked at 20 websites, each talks about it as if everyone knows what it is but by reading between the lines , all 20 websites seem to be talking about something slightly different.

Cheers
Derrick

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: